mirror of
https://github.com/joelwmale/webhook-action.git
synced 2024-12-11 08:24:31 +01:00
116 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
116 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
# Contributing
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your interest in helping out! Here are a **few** _weird_ tricks to
|
|
~~cut your mortgage in half~~ maximize the global net efficiency of your efforts!
|
|
|
|
## TL;DR: Checklist
|
|
|
|
When opening an [issue](#issues):
|
|
- [ ] search open/closed issues
|
|
- [ ] discuss bug/enhancement in new or old issue
|
|
|
|
[PR](#prs) time:
|
|
- [ ] write tests
|
|
- [ ] implement feature/fix bug
|
|
- [ ] update docs
|
|
- [ ] make a note in change log
|
|
|
|
Remember, you don't need to do it all yourself; any of these are helpful! 😎
|
|
|
|
## Issues
|
|
|
|
### Search open + closed issues for similar cases.
|
|
|
|
You may find an open issue that closely matches what you are thinking. You
|
|
may also find a closed issue with discussion that either solves your problem
|
|
or explains why we are unlikely to solve it in the near future.
|
|
|
|
If you find a matching issue that is open, and marked `accepted` and/or `help
|
|
wanted`, you might want to [open a PR](#prs).
|
|
|
|
### Open an issue.
|
|
|
|
Let's discuss your issue. Could be as simple as unclear documentation or a
|
|
wonky config file.
|
|
If you're suggesting a feature, it might exist and need better
|
|
documentation, or it might be in process. Even given those, some discussion might
|
|
be warranted to ensure the enhancement is clear.
|
|
|
|
You're welcome to jump right to a PR, but without a discussion, can't make any
|
|
guarantees about merging.
|
|
|
|
That said: sometimes seeing the code makes the discussion clearer.😄
|
|
|
|
This is a helpful contribution all by itself. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
## PRs
|
|
|
|
If you would like to implement something, firstly: thanks! Community contributions
|
|
are a magical thing. Like Redux or [the flux capacitor](https://youtu.be/SR5BfQ4rEqQ?t=2m25s),
|
|
they make open source possible.
|
|
|
|
**Working on your first Pull Request?**
|
|
You can learn how from this _free_ series [How to Contribute to an Open Source Project on GitHub](https://egghead.io/series/how-to-contribute-to-an-open-source-project-on-github).
|
|
|
|
Here are some things to keep in mind when working on a PR:
|
|
|
|
#### Tests
|
|
|
|
A PR that is just failing test cases for an existing issue is very helpful, as this
|
|
can take as much time (if not more) as it takes to implement a new feature or fix
|
|
a bug.
|
|
|
|
If you only have enough time to write tests, fantastic! Submit away. This is a great
|
|
jumping-off point for a core contributor or even another PR to continue what you've started.
|
|
|
|
#### Docs
|
|
|
|
For enhancements to rules, please update the docs in `docs/rules` matching the rule
|
|
filename from `src/rules`.
|
|
|
|
Also, take a quick look at the rule summary in [README.md] in case it could use tweaking,
|
|
or add a line if you've implemented a new rule.
|
|
|
|
Bugfixes may not warrant docs changes, though it's worth skimming the existing
|
|
docs to see if there are any relevant caveats that need to be removed.
|
|
|
|
#### Changelog
|
|
|
|
Please add a quick blurb to the [**Unreleased**](./CHANGELOG.md#unreleased) section of the change log. Give yourself
|
|
some credit, and please link back to the PR for future reference. This is especially
|
|
helpful for resolver changes, as the resolvers are less frequently modified and published.
|
|
|
|
Note also that the change log can't magically link back to Github entities (i.e. PRs,
|
|
issues, users) or rules; there are a handful of footnote URL definitions at the bottom.
|
|
You may need to add one or more URL if you've square-bracketed any such items.
|
|
|
|
## Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
This is not so much a set of guidelines as a reference for what I hope may become
|
|
a shared perspective on the project. I hope to write a longer essay to this end
|
|
in the future. Comments are welcome, I'd like this to be as clear as possible.
|
|
|
|
### Empathy
|
|
|
|
People have feelings and perspectives, and people say and believe things for good reasons.
|
|
|
|
If you find that you summarily disagree with a perspective stated by someone else,
|
|
you likely each have histories that have moved you in opposite directions on a continuum
|
|
that probably does not have a "wrong" or "right" end. It may be that you simply
|
|
are working toward different goals that require different strategies. Every decision
|
|
has pros and cons, and could result in some winners and some losers. It's great to
|
|
discuss this so that both are well-known, and realize that even with infinite discussion,
|
|
cons and losers will likely never go to zero.
|
|
|
|
Also note that we're not doing brain surgery here, so while it's fine if we spend some time
|
|
understanding each other, cordial disagreement should not be expensive in the
|
|
long run, and we can accept that we will get some things wrong before we get them right (if ever!).
|
|
|
|
If we can all get together behind the common goal of embracing empathy, everything else should be able to work itself out.
|
|
|
|
#### Attribution
|
|
|
|
Thanks for help from http://mozillascience.github.io/working-open-workshop/contributing/
|
|
for inspiration before I wrote this. --ben
|
|
|
|
[README.md]: ./README.md
|