mirror of
https://github.com/joelwmale/webhook-action.git
synced 2024-12-01 20:05:21 +01:00
71 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
|
# Prevent calling `expect` conditionally (`no-conditional-expect`)
|
||
|
|
||
|
This rule prevents the use of `expect` in conditional blocks, such as `if`s &
|
||
|
`catch`s.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Rule Details
|
||
|
|
||
|
Jest considered a test to have failed if it throws an error, rather than on if
|
||
|
any particular function is called, meaning conditional calls to `expect` could
|
||
|
result in tests silently being skipped.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Additionally, conditionals tend to make tests more brittle and complex, as they
|
||
|
increase the amount of mental thinking needed to understand what is actually
|
||
|
being tested.
|
||
|
|
||
|
While `expect.assertions` & `expect.hasAssertions` can help prevent tests from
|
||
|
silently being skipped, when combined with conditionals they typically result in
|
||
|
even more complexity being introduced.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following patterns are warnings:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```js
|
||
|
it('foo', () => {
|
||
|
doTest && expect(1).toBe(2);
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
|
||
|
it('bar', () => {
|
||
|
if (!skipTest) {
|
||
|
expect(1).toEqual(2);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
|
||
|
it('baz', async () => {
|
||
|
try {
|
||
|
await foo();
|
||
|
} catch (err) {
|
||
|
expect(err).toMatchObject({ code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND' });
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
```
|
||
|
|
||
|
The following patterns are not warnings:
|
||
|
|
||
|
```js
|
||
|
it('foo', () => {
|
||
|
expect(!value).toBe(false);
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
|
||
|
function getValue() {
|
||
|
if (process.env.FAIL) {
|
||
|
return 1;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
return 2;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
it('foo', () => {
|
||
|
expect(getValue()).toBe(2);
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
|
||
|
it('validates the request', () => {
|
||
|
try {
|
||
|
processRequest(request);
|
||
|
} catch {
|
||
|
// ignore errors
|
||
|
} finally {
|
||
|
expect(validRequest).toHaveBeenCalledWith(request);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
});
|
||
|
```
|